National Law – A Journal of Legal Issues

The Natlaw Blog is your best resource for legal issues. We cover law, lobbying, politics & crime.
October 21, 2014

The best way to Compose an Eviction Notice

Posted by : Dustin Coons
Filed under : Civil Law

eviction noticeAn eviction notice form is a landlord’s notice to the tenant to vacate and deliver control of the rental premises describing motives of eviction as a result of a break of the lease arrangement. Form was prepared by the advantages and disadvantages of writing an eviction notice versus purchasing a state special, lawyer on the internet for less than ten dollars.

The best way to compose the pitfalls as well as an eviction notice?

A suitable form should include these characteristics:

It should list all tenants who’ll be impacted by this notice.
It should detail the address of the premises.
It should summarize the reasons for the eviction whether it’s a different violation of the lease contract or nonpayment.
It should allow a timeframe for conformity while it’s a 3 day eviction, 5-day eviction and so forth.
It should tell the tenants that failing to obey the notice that additional legal action will be taken against them.
It should include signature, name, address, telephone of the property landlord.
It should include the date.

Do you know the pitfalls of composing an eviction notice?

A written eviction notice contains mistakes and is more often than not incomplete. The same applies to universal free forms downloaded on the web.

Using either a free-form downloaded from the net frequently results in the following or a written notice:

The notice will be ignored by the renter as such notices nearly always contain mistakes. The landlord will neglect to apply it due to the notice being incomplete or comprising mistakes.

This both will result in financial loss for the landlord as well as the mental anguish. The owner frequently must begin the procedure again. No landlord needs to experience this scenario. It’s a good idea to do things right from the beginning. The expression, the low-cost turns out high-priced, is quite accurate in his instance.

Tags :

September 21, 2014

Protect Your Intellectual Property

Posted by : Dustin Coons
Filed under : Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property

Imagine you propose that both things consent to learn more about the likelihood of forming a business alliance that only might become rather prosperous and choose to do what I lately did and contact the managing partner of a consulting firm? Company is about every once in a while and dealmaking a Solopreneur has to pitch a proposition that is good to the proper prospect. After all, nothing ventured, nothing gained.

But there’s danger involved, generally for the thing that is smaller. Intangible services are usually offered by solopreneurs known as intellectual property. We trade on wisdom and our expertise, our brand and standing, that which permits us to earn a living and differentiates us from the pack.

Participating in a joint venture or business alliance includes the sharing of intellectual property by one or all the parties (in this particular instance, it’d be me). How will you guard yourself against unscrupulous operators who might determine to appropriate your IP that is precious as you are out there proposing possible business deals to parties and attempting to be proactive?

Denver lawyer Susan F. Fisher explains intellectual property or trade secrets as “any formula, procedure, or advice that gives you a competitive advantage… anything that takes time, money or attempt to develop and that you do not need prospective adversaries to understand about.”

Most business alliances, including licensing arrangements, require company owner or a Solopreneur to disclose other IP and trade secrets. Shielding your realm’s coin is a top priority. Astonishingly, trade secret protection can largely be done by taking only several easy measures that cost no cash whatsoever to enact.

Tags :

August 21, 2014

How Far Should Law Enforcement Be permitted to visit Get Offenders?

Posted by : Dustin Coons
Filed under : Criminal Law

criminal lawI criminal law would like to introduce a question. Do the ends justify the means? Well do criminals? They’d most likely don’t have any trouble replying if this question was asked of the United States Drug Enforcement Agency. It’d be a yes. It will be an emphatic yes with bells on.

Now I’ve a huge issue together with the reality they don’t have any trouble. I do. Inside my perspective there’s not a time when doing whatever it takes, to get a consequence, may be warranted. Regulations and rules and laws apply to the good guys in the exact same manner they apply to the baddies. Never is my reply. But I am not here to let you know what to believe. I would like to summarize the scenario and you’ll be able to answer that question for yourself.

The U.S. DEA is being taken to court after setting up a fake Facebook account using actual photos and private info grabbed from the mobile phone of a New York girl.

The girl concerned was detained in July 2010 on charges of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, to be honest. The woman concerned was accused of being part of a drug supply network. The court records reveal the woman concerned pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge and was sentenced to time functioned as community detention.

Rather she received a reduced sentence in return for a plea agreement where she admitted being part of the drug syndicate although the woman involved could have been sentenced to life imprisonment. The court records clearly show so it was a no-brainer, the woman concerned participated in jailhouse conversations with co-conspirators.

Tags : ,

Environmental law

Natlaw’s Newsletter Subscription

facebook
Law Journal

Natlaw’s Contributors

Max Bernas
Setareh Ebrahimian
Anita Mazumdar Chambers
Nicole Raviele
Drew Howell
Tim Sheehan
Matt Purushotham